Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
ST. PAUL'S POLISH NATIONAL CATHOLIC CHURCH, Petitioner, v. Eric A. HILT, as agent for Susan Hilt, and Mark J. Niznik, Respondents.
Petitioner, St. Paul's Polish National Catholic Church (“St. Paul's”), has petitioned this Court for a writ of certiorari seeking to quash the trial court's amended discovery order which compels it to identify church members and produce records of membership lists. We agree with St. Paul's that the trial court's amended order is deficient because the court failed to make a judicial determination concerning St. Paul's incorporation status, which was a disputed issue below that goes directly to the heart of one of the stated bases for compelling disclosure. In addition, we further find that the amended order is inadequate because the trial court failed to address and make specific findings concerning St. Paul's asserted claim of associational privilege provided by the First Amendment. Resolution of these issues by the trial court is essential for meaningful appellate review. See Nemours Found. v. Arroyo, 262 So. 3d 208, 211 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018); State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Knapp, 234 So. 3d 843, 848 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018); Dismas Charities, Inc. v. Dabbs, 795 So. 2d 1038 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001).
Accordingly, we grant St. Paul's amended petition for certiorari, quash the trial court's amended discovery order without prejudice, and remand the matter to the trial court for further consideration.
Petition Granted; Order Quashed; Remanded for further proceedings.
Harris, J.
Wallis and Soud, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: Case No. 5D23-933
Decided: March 01, 2024
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)