PATLAN v. STATE (2024)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jose Angel PATLAN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D23-1879

Decided: January 24, 2024

Before FERNANDEZ, SCALES, and MILLER, JJ.

Jose Angel Patlan, in proper person. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Richard L. Polin, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Affirmed. See Walden v. State, 112 So. 3d 578, 580 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (“[E]rrors in the assessment of costs ․ are not subject to correction through rule 3.800(a).”); Branch v. State, 322 So. 3d 209, 210 (Fla. 1st DCA 2021) (“[C]hallenges to ․ the procedure employed by the court when imposing fines and costs ․ are not challenges to an ‘illegal sentence’ correctable under rule 3.800(a).”); Blakley v. State, 746 So. 2d 1182, 1186-87 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999) (“To be illegal within the meaning of rule 3.800(a)[,] the sentence must impose a kind of punishment that no judge under the entire body of sentencing statutes could possibly inflict under any set of factual circumstances.”); see also Hoffman v. State, 413 So. 2d 150, 151 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982) (“[Florida Rules of Civil Procedure do] not apply to a criminal proceeding in a circuit court ․ [or to] appellate proceedings in the circuit court.”).

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network