REHAB RESTORATION LLC v. CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION (2024)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

REHAB RESTORATION, LLC, a/a/o Andres Arcila, Appellant, v. CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION, Appellee.

No. 3D22-2171

Decided: January 17, 2024

Before MILLER, GORDO and BOKOR, JJ.

Valiente, Carollo & McElligott, PLLC, and Caroline M. Carollo, for appellant. Methe & Rothell, P.A., and Kristi Bergemann Rothell (West Palm Beach), for appellee.

Affirmed. See All Ins. Restoration Servs., Inc. v. Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp., 328 So. 3d 1057, 1061 (Fla. 3d DCA 2021) (“Seeking payment of an invoice for services already rendered does not equate to requesting authorization to exceed the $3,000 limit. Therefore, although Citizen[s] is required to respond within forty-eight hours to a request to exceed the $3,000 limit for reasonable emergency measures, it is not required to respond to a demand for payment of an invoice for reasonable emergency measures already rendered to an insured. As such, the trial court properly entered final summary judgment in favor of Citizens and against AIRS because under the unambiguous language in the insurance contract, Citizens satisfied its contractual obligations when it submitted the $3,000 check to AIRS.”).

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network