Bernardo de la Peña, Appellant, v. SC (2024)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Bernardo de la Peña, Appellant, v. SC Mota Associates Limited Partnership, Appellee.

No. 3D23-1160

Decided: January 10, 2024

Before EMAS, FERNANDEZ and SCALES, JJ.

Ayala Law, P.A., and Eduardo A. Maura and Luis F. Quesada, for appellant. Slusher & Rosenblum, P.A., and Jonathan S. Glickman and Jeremy E. Slusher (West Palm Beach), for appellee.

Affirmed. See La Ley Sports Complex at City of Homestead, LLC v. City of Homestead, 255 So. 3d 468, 469 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018) (“In reviewing a final judgment rendered from a non-jury trial, the trial court's findings of fact are clothed with a presumption of correctness. Fito v. Attorney's Title Ins. Fund, Inc., 83 So. 3d 755, 757-58 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011). We apply a clear error standard to the findings of fact, and a finding will not be disturbed unless it is totally unsupported by competent and substantial evidence, it is clearly against the weight of the evidence, or it was induced by an erroneous view of the law. Id.; Holland v. Gross, 89 So. 2d 255, 258 (Fla. 1956).”)

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network