POWELL v. STATE (2024)

Appellant appeals from the trial court's order sentencing him to the statutory maximum of five years in prison after he violated probation. Appellant argues that the court erred when it imposed the $100 cost of prosecution without a request from the State and failed to make statutorily required written findings of fact after finding him to be a violent felony offender of special concern.

We affirm Appellant's challenge of the costs of prosecution in accordance with Parks v. State, 371 So.3d 392 (Fla. 1st DCA 2023). We reverse, however, as to Appellant's second argument. As the State's brief concedes, trial courts must make written findings as to whether a violent felony offender of special concern poses a danger to the community. § 948.06(8)(e), Fla. Stat. Such findings are absent here. Accordingly, we remand for the entry of a written order making the required statutory findings. See Gettis v. State, 289 So. 3d 560 (Fla. 1st DCA 2020); Glenn v. State, 219 So. 3d 1010 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017).

Affirmed in part, Reversed in part, and Remanded.

Per Curiam.

Osterhaus, C.J., and Rowe and Bilbrey, JJ., concur.