Darryl Edward Mcknight Jr., Appellant, v. State of Florida, Appellee. (2023)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Darryl Edward Mcknight Jr., Appellant, v. State of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D2022-2472

Decided: November 29, 2023

Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Lori A. Willner, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and David Welch, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Appellant challenges the imposition of costs on appeal. We affirm the imposition of costs of prosecution without further comment. See Parks v. State, 48 Fla. L. Weekly D1524 (Fla. 1st DCA Aug. 2, 2023). As to Appellant's claim that the State failed to request the FDLE costs that were imposed, the record shows otherwise. To the extent Appellant argues that there was not sufficient evidence to support imposition of the FDLE costs, this issue was not preserved for appeal. See Mapp v. State, 71 So. 3d 776 (Fla. 2011) (holding that a claim that insufficient evidence was presented to support the order for restitution was not preserved for appeal by filing 3.800(b) motion).

Affirmed.

Per Curiam.

Roberts, Ray, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network