Rinad Kitaygorodskiy, Appellant, v. The State of Florida, Appellee. (2023)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Rinad Kitaygorodskiy, Appellant, v. The State of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D22-1270

Decided: November 15, 2023

Before FERNANDEZ, SCALES and HENDON, JJ.

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Susan S. Lerner, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Ivy R. Ginsberg, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Affirmed. See Edwards v. State, 712 So. 2d 407, 408 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998) (concluding that the erroneous admission of a police officer's identification of the defendant in a crime videotape “was merely cumulative” where eyewitnesses testified at trial that the defendant was the person who committed the crime; thus, “any error resulting from the admission of the identification testimony was harmless”); Scott v. State, 66 So. 3d 923, 930 (Fla. 2011) (“[U]nder the ‘invited response’ doctrine, the State is permitted ‘to emphasize uncontradicted evidence for the narrow purpose of rebutting a defense argument since the defense has invited the response.’ ” (quoting Caballero v. State, 851 So. 2d 655, 660 (Fla. 2003))).

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network