SUPPORT LLC v. SMARKETING TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION (2023)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

TheDIGITAL.SUPPORT LLC, etc., Appellant, v. SMARKETING TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION, etc., et al., Appellees.

No. 3D23-157

Decided: September 13, 2023

Before SCALES, HENDON, and MILLER, JJ.

PAG Law PLLC, and Patricia Acosta, and Alexandra Goodstone, for appellant. EPGD Attorneys at Law, P.A., and Justin Hassani, and Oscar A. Gomez, for appellees.

Affirmed. See Bank of New York Mellon v. One Seagrove Place Owners Ass'n, 276 So. 3d 486, 487 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019) (“The Bank's motion set forth a colorable claim [under rule 1.540], and the trial court held an evidentiary hearing. But the Bank furnished no transcript of the hearing in the appendix filed in this appeal. In the absence of a transcript, we must presume that the trial court's order denying the Bank's motion ‘was based on additional evidence adduced at the hearing.’ We thus AFFIRM the order denying relief from the ․ judgment.” (quoting Snowden v. Wells Fargo Bank, 172 So. 3d 506, 508 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015))).

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network