ADAMS v. STATE (2023)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Anthony ADAMS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D23-382

Decided: September 06, 2023

Before SCALES, LINDSEY and GORDO, JJ.

Anthony Adams, in proper person. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Sheron Wells, Assistant Attorney General (Tallahassee), for appellee.

Affirmed. See Williams v. Wasi, 681 So. 2d 839, 840 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996) (“We find no merit in his distinction between basic gain-time and incentive gain-time, holding that both may be subject to forfeiture by the DOC pursuant to section 944.28(1), Florida Statutes (1995).”); Waldrup v. Dugger, 562 So. 2d 687, 689 (Fla. 1990) (noting a “basic gain-time award was subject to forfeiture for unacceptable conduct”); Singletary v. Jones, 681 So. 2d 836, 837 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996) (“[I]nmates receive a lump sum award of all basic gain time to which they may be entitled throughout the full term of their sentences upon entering the prison system. This gain time is earned when so credited, and is thereafter subject to earned gain time forfeiture.”).

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network