MCCRAY v. STATE (2023)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Terrance MCCRAY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D23-607

Decided: September 06, 2023

Before EMAS, MILLER, and BOKOR, JJ.

Terrance Mccray, in proper person. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Magaly Rodriguez, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Affirmed. See Corzo v. State, 806 So. 2d 642, 645 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) (explaining ineffective assistance of counsel claim on postconviction relief motion is procedurally barred when prior opinion on direct appeal expressly addresses issue of ineffective assistance of counsel); Wright v. State, 113 So. 3d 43, 44 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) (“[Appellant] failed to provide any details regarding the allegedly foregone plea offer, which is required as part of the prejudice analysis in claims such as these.”); Griffin v. State, 866 So. 2d 1, 22 (Fla. 2003) (“[W]here individual claims of error alleged are either procedurally barred or without merit, the claim of cumulative error must fail.”); see also McCray v. State, 283 So. 3d 406, 408–09 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019) (hearing appellant's ineffective assistance claim and finding it to be without merit).

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network