MORRISON v. STATE (2023)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Markey MORRISON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D22-2605

Decided: August 25, 2023

Matthew Metz, Public Defender, and Jane Almy, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Robin A. Compton, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

In this Anders ¹ appeal, we affirm the revocation of probation and the judgment and sentence imposed upon Morrison, as well as the trial court's order denying Morrison's motion to withdraw his plea. Because the record does not include a written revocation order that identifies the terms and conditions of probation violated, the trial court on remand is instructed to enter a written revocation order that specifies the terms and conditions of probation that Morrison was found to have violated as orally pronounced. See Barber v. State, 342 So. 3d 297, 297 (Fla. 5th DCA 2022); Mack v. State, 694 So. 2d 130, 130 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997).

Affirmed and Remanded with instructions.

FOOTNOTES

1. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

Per Curiam.

Makar, Eisnaugle, and Soud, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network