SANTANA v. DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS (2023)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Reynaldo SANTANA, Appellant, v. DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS, etc., et al., Appellees.

No. 3D22-1860

Decided: August 16, 2023

Before LOGUE, C.J., and MILLER, and LOBREE, JJ.

Pomeranz & Associates, P.A., and Mark L. Pomeranz (Hallandale), for appellant. McGlinchey Stafford, and William L. Grimsley (Jacksonville); Albert D. Rey, P.A., and Albert D. Rey, for appellees.

Affirmed. See Watson v. Vafides, 212 So. 2d 358, 362 (Fla. 1st DCA 1968) (“The object of a notice of public sale is to inform the Public of the nature and condition of the property to be sold, and of the time, place, and terms of the sale.”); 37 Fla. Jur. 2d Mortgages, Etc. § 300 (2023) (same); see also Tanis v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A., 289 So. 3d 517, 521 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019) (alterations in original) (quoting McQuiddy v. Ware, 87 U.S. 14, 18 (1873)) (“Crucially, here, ‘[t]here is no averment that [appellants] did not have actual notice of the proceedings against [them] in time to protect [their] rights.’ ”).

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network