STROUD v. STATE (2023)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Bill STROUD, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D23-0734

Decided: August 09, 2023

Before SCALES, MILLER, and BOKOR, JJ.

Bill Stroud, in proper person. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Richard L. Polin, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Affirmed. See Lopez v. State, 2 So. 3d 1057, 1059 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) (“It is clear in the case law of this state that double jeopardy challenges to convictions are not cognizable under [Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure] 3.800(a).”); Ramirez v. State, 47 Fla. L. Weekly D1823, D1824, ––– So.3d ––––, ––––, 2022 WL 3903532, *1 (Fla. 3d DCA Aug. 31, 2022) (“A motion to correct illegal sentence under rule 3.800(a) is not cognizable where, as here, the defendant seeks to challenge the validity of the conviction and, only by extension, the ‘legality’ of the resulting sentence.”); Kingry v. State, 28 So. 3d 173, 174 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) (“Having freely and voluntarily entered into [a plea] agreement and accepted its benefits, appellant may not now seek to be relieved of one of the burdens imposed upon him pursuant to the agreement.”).

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network