LLAURADO v. DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION (2023)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Roger LLAURADO, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, Appellee.

No. 3D22-1884

Decided: July 26, 2023

Before EMAS, GORDO and LOBREE, JJ.

Roger Llaurado, in proper person. Brooke Elizabeth Adams, Chief Appellate Counsel (Tallahassee), for appellee.

Affirmed. See A & S Ent., LLC v. Fla. Dep't of Revenue, 282 So. 3d 905, 908-909 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019) (“The basic cornerstones of procedural due process are notice of the case and an opportunity to be heard. Due process is satisfied where the notice and opportunity to be heard are ‘granted at a meaningful time and in a meaningful manner’ ”) (additional citations omitted); Jennings v. Dade Cty., 589 So. 2d 1337, 1340 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991) (“A quasi-judicial hearing generally meets basic due process requirements if the parties are provided notice of the hearing and an opportunity to be heard”). See also Fla. Admin. Code R. 28-106.111(4) (providing: “Any person who receives written notice of an agency decision and who fails to file a written request for a hearing within 21 days waives the right to request a hearing on such matters. This provision does not eliminate the availability of equitable tolling as a defense”).

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network