CARLOS MONGALO v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA (2023)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

CARLOS MONGALO, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D23-0604

Decided: June 26, 2023

Upon consideration, Appellant's Motion for Rehearing is hereby denied. See McDonnell v. Sanford Airport Auth., 200 So. 3d 83, 84 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015) (quoting Ayala v. Gonzalez, 984 So. 2d 523, 526 (Fla. 5th DCA) (“The purpose of a motion for rehearing is to direct the court to points of law or fact that, in the opinion of the movant, the court overlooked or misapprehended in its opinion. [See Fla. R. App. P. 3.330(a).] It is not a vehicle through which ‘an unhappy litigant or attorney [may] reargue the same points previously presented. ․’) [or points that could have been raised in the initial brief, but were not.]”).

Upon consideration, the several appendices filed in contravention of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.220 is hereby stricken.

FERNANDEZ, C.J., and SCALES and BOKOR, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network