Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
H.J., the mother, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, et al., Appellees.
Appellant, H.J., the mother, challenges an order terminating her parental rights to L.H., her nine-year-old child, at the behest of appellee, the Department of Children and Family Services. As the incidents of violence and mental abuse chronicled in the record amply support the conclusion the mother had “the opportunity and capability to prevent and knowingly failed to prevent egregious conduct that threaten[ed] the life, safety, or physical, mental, or emotional health of the ․ child's sibling” and the termination was in the best interest of the child, we affirm and write only to commend the trial judge on her lucid, carefully crafted order and dispassionate handling of this troubling case. § 39.806(1)(f), Fla. Stat. (2022); see also § 39.806(2), Fla. Stat. (“Reasonable efforts to preserve and reunify families are not required if a court of competent jurisdiction has determined that any of the events described in [paragraph (1)(f)] have occurred.”); S.M.O. v. Dep't of Child. & Fams., 357 So. 3d 773, 778 (Fla. 3d DCA 2023) (“Section 39.806(1)(f) permits termination of parental rights to siblings, even if there is no nexus between the egregious conduct and the potential harm to the siblings ․”); Dep't of Child. & Fams. v. S.S.L., 352 So. 3d 521, 528 (Fla. 5th DCA 2022) (reversing and remanding with instructions to terminate parents’ parental rights as to both children even though only one sibling had signs of abuse); E.A. v. Dep't of Child. & Fams., 332 So. 3d 493, 499 (Fla. 4th DCA 2021) (upholding constitutionality of section 39.806(1)(f)).
Affirmed.
MILLER, J.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 3D22-2036
Decided: July 05, 2023
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)