FERRIS v. FERRIS (1999)

District Court of Appeal of Florida,Fourth District.

Robert D. FERRIS, Appellant, v. Glenda Fay FERRIS a/k/a Glenda Fay Demotte and Thomas Herbert Landress, Appellees.

No. 98–2913

Decided: February 10, 1999

Robert D. Ferris, Raiford, pro se. No appearance for appellee.

The appellant appeals from an order denying a motion to rescind a judgment of garnishment. In his motion to rescind, the appellant claimed that he did not receive a copy of the garnishment entered about nine months earlier. The court denied the motion, and appellant filed a motion for rehearing raising entirely new issues related to the substance of the garnishment judgment itself. That too was denied. From that denial, he appeals. The points argued in this appeal should have been raised in an appeal of the garnishment judgment itself and are thus untimely. No argument having been advanced that the denial of the motion to rescind was error, we affirm.

PER CURIAM.

DELL, WARNER and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network