Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
BANKERS TRUST COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, N.A., etc., Petitioner, v. John William WEIDNER, III, etc., et al, Respondent.
Bankers Trust Co. of California, N.A. successfully obtained a summary judgment of foreclosure of the property involved in this action. A foreclosure sale was set for December 19, 1996. There is no question that the summary judgment was properly entered. The mortgagor, however, died on December 3, 1996 leaving two children. Her father moved to be appointed guardian of the minor child and petitioned the court to stay the foreclosure sale for at least 90 days. The court went him one better and granted the stay indefinitely. Bankers Trust seeks certiorari; we grant it and reverse.
The sole reason stated for the stay is that the guardian needs “to see if the assets of the minor child can be preserved by sale of the homestead, rather than loss of the homestead by foreclosure.” There are no allegations that the property value exceeds the amount of the judgment nor is there any requirement that any security be given for the stay or that the property be insured or even maintained by the guardian during the period of the stay. The court has stayed indefinitely the enforcement of a mortgage merely on the offhand chance that there may be equity in the property in excess of the debt. This petition and the time to reschedule a new sale has already given the guardian in excess of 60 days to make that determination. That is time enough.
We grant the writ of certiorari and direct the trial court to reschedule the foreclosure sale.
HARRIS, Judge.
COBB and GOSHORN, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 97-195.
Decided: February 28, 1997
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida,Fifth District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)