Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Janice CARPENTER, Appellant, v. B & G RESORT PROPERTIES, LTD. and B & G Resort Management, Inc., Appellees.
In this workers' compensation appeal, the claimant, Janice Carpenter, appeals a final order of the Judge of Compensation Claims (JCC) which denied claimant's petition for benefits against B & G Resort Properties, Ltd. and B & G Resort Management, Inc., appellees, on the ground that appellees were not claimant's employer under section 440.02(14), Florida Statutes (1996). We affirm.
Claimant was employed as the head housekeeper of the Wind Drift Motel when she injured her back on August 12, 1997. At the time of her injury, the motel was being operated by a receiver appointed by the circuit court to protect the motel property during the pendency of litigation between appellee, B & G Resort Properties Ltd., an owner of the property along with appellee, B & G Resort Management, Inc., and potential purchasers, who had occupied the property under a pre-occupancy agreement pending closing on the sale of the property. The JCC found that, at the time of her injury, claimant was employed by the receiver and not appellees. Competent substantial evidence in the record supports the JCC's findings in that claimant neither received directions from nor was under the control of appellees. Because appellees were not employers of claimant, the JCC had no jurisdiction over appellees for the purpose of imposing workers' compensation liability on them for claimant's injuries. See Pacific Indem. Co. et al. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Bd., 258 Cal.App.2d 35, 65 Cal.Rptr. 429 (2d Dist.1968), see also Ricketts v. Haynes, 630 So.2d 1232 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994), and § 440.02(14), Fla. Stat. (1997).
AFFIRMED.
PER CURIAM.
BENTON, VAN NORTWICK and LEWIS, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 1D00-32.
Decided: April 20, 2001
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida,First District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)