SHVARTS v. CONNOR (1997)

District Court of Appeal of Florida,Fourth District.

Aleksandr SHVARTS, Appellant, v. A. Lewis O'CONNOR and Alice W. O'Connor, Appellees.

Nos. 96-2831, 96-3497.

Decided: April 23, 1997

Paul R. Lipton and Michele A. Maracini of Bedzow, Korn & Kan, P.A., Aventura, and Joaquina M. Lazaro and Michael R. Koblenz of Mound, Cotton & Wollan, New York City, for appellant. Robert R. Edwards of Jennings, Valancy & Edwards, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellees.

We affirm case no. 96-2831. In case no. 96-3497, the O'Connors appealed an order determining the amount of a supersedeas bond on appeal. Review of such an order is by motion. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.310(f). Had review been sought in this matter, it would have been disposed of by us months ago. Instead, by designating it as an appeal, it followed the lengthy course of all full appeals. As we have affirmed the lower court's ruling on the merits in case no. 96-2831, the issue regarding the supersedeas bond is now moot.

PER CURIAM.

WARNER, POLEN and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network