Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
W.G. ROE & SONS, Appellant, v. Javier RAZO-GUEVARA, Appellee.
In this workers' compensation appeal, the Employer/Carrier (E/C) appeal, and Claimant cross-appeals, an order granting some requests for indemnity benefits and denying others. We affirm the order in all respects except to the extent the Judge of Compensation Claims (JCC) limited his award of temporary total disability benefits to six months.
The JCC limited the award to six months by applying section 440.093(3), Florida Statutes (2004). This statute provides that, “[s]ubject to the payment of permanent benefits under s. 440.15, in no event shall temporary benefits for a compensable mental or nervous injury be paid for more than 6 months after the date of [physical MMI]․” The scope of section 440.093(3), Florida Statutes, is an issue of first impression.
In construing a statute, courts must look to its plain language. See Fla. Dep't of Educ. v. Cooper, 858 So.2d 394, 396 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003). Subject [to] is defined as dependent on some act or condition. The Merriam-Webster Dictionary 712 (New ed., 2004). Thus, the six-month limitation on temporary psychiatric benefits is conditioned upon the payment of permanent benefits for the associated physical injury. This means the limitation does not apply unless permanent benefits are being paid. Because Claimant is not being paid permanent benefits, this statute does not apply here. Therefore, the JCC erred in applying it to limit Claimant's TTD benefits.
AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED for proceedings consistent with this opinion.
PER CURIAM.
LEWIS and THOMAS, JJ., and LAWRENCE, JR., L. ARTHUR, Senior Judge, concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 1D07-3598.
Decided: December 31, 2008
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida,First District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)