Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Rafael Manuel MORERA, Jr. and Rafael Manuel Morera, Sr., Appellants, v. Petrona Elba CASTELLON, Roberto Castellon and Elba Castellon, Appellees.
Rafael Manuel Morera, Jr. and Rafael Manuel Morera, Sr. (collectively Morera), appeal from the lower court's final judgment in favor of Petrona Elba Castellon, Roberto Castellon and Elba Castellon (collectively Castellon).
At about 8:25 a.m. on March 13, 1991, Morera, Jr. (plaintiff below) and Petrona Castellon were involved in an auto accident at the intersection of 187th Terrace and 124th Avenue in Miami-Dade County. Morera, Jr. was driving a 1986 Mustang on 187th Terrace with the right of way and Castellon was on 124th Avenue, which had a stop sign. Morera, Jr., who was 16 years old at the time, testified that he was headed towards school and driving about 30 miles per hour. As he was about a car length from the intersection, he saw a car approaching the stop sign that slowed down for a few seconds but continued through the sign and jumped in front of him. Morera, Jr. braked and swerved to attempt to avoid the accident, but collided with Castellon's car. After the impact, Morera, Jr.'s car went off the road and hit a tree.
Armando Rodriguez, a friend of Morera, Jr., testified that he was driving behind Morera, Jr.'s car on the way to school. Rodriguez was going approximately 25 miles per hour and he estimated that Morera, Jr. was driving the same speed because he did not pull away from him. Rodriguez was approximately one block away but did not see Castellon's car before Morera, Jr. swerved to try to avoid the impact.
Castellon testified that she was going 20 miles per hour prior to the stop sign. She stopped, looked both ways and did not see an on-coming vehicle. When she started into the intersection Castellon saw, “something, a car moving faster than like a plane toward me.” She braked, Morera, Jr.'s car struck her, she lost control of her vehicle, turned 180 degrees to the other side, and was “moving everywhere.” 1
We agree with Morera that a new trial is appropriate because the jury verdict was contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence. Castellon was at least partially negligent as she had a duty to make a complete stop at the stop sign, look for oncoming traffic, and yield the right of way. See Pierce v. Nicholson Supply Company Inc., 676 So.2d 70 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996).
We reverse and remand for a new trial.
FOOTNOTES
1. The evidence is undisputed that it was Castellon who broadsided Morera, Jr.
SORONDO, Judge.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 97-1964.
Decided: August 05, 1998
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida,Third District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)