Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
HIGHLANDS COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD and Gallagher Bassett Services, Inc., Appellants, v. Juan CARRASQUILLO and Florida Department of Labor and Employment Security, Division of Workers' Compensation, Appellees.
This case involves the question of whether the Division of Workers' Compensation or the employer/carrier is entitled to the social security offset in a case in which the employer/carrier is required to pay permanent total disability (PTD) benefits, and the Division is required to pay supplemental benefits under subsections 440.15(1)(a) and (1)(e)1, Florida Statutes (1983), respectively.
The facts in this case are undisputed. Claimant suffered a compensable injury on April 3, 1984, and was voluntarily accepted as permanently and totally disabled on June 22, 1992, retroactive to October 8, 1988. The employer/carrier then reduced claimant's PTD benefits in accordance with the social security offset provided in section 440.15(9), Florida Statutes (1983), beginning in November 1989. In 1992, the Division also began reducing the supplemental benefits by the social security offset. Thus, both the employer/carrier and the Division were utilizing the social security offset to reduce their respective compensation obligations.
We affirm the order determining that the Division had the first right to any available social security offset pursuant to Florida Administrative Code Rule 38F-24.027(5)(c). That rule expressly provides that “[t]he Division shall have first priority in taking any available social security offset on dates of accident prior to July 1, 1984.” In so ruling, we find nothing in the rule that conflicts with either section 440.15(9) or Hunt v. Stratton, 677 So.2d 64 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996).
AFFIRMED.
PER CURIAM.
ERVIN, BOOTH and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 97-4950.
Decided: October 07, 1998
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida,First District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)