Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Jonathan WOLF, Appellant, v. NATIONS CAPITAL, INC., a corporation, Appellee.
Wolf contracted to become a mortgage broker/real estate salesman with Nations. Wolf's contract required that he split all commissions received during this relationship with Nations and provided that his right to receive commissions for work in progress at the time of termination would not be recognized unless the transaction closed within fourteen days of his termination by Nations.
Wolf worked on the sale of his brother's business in another state and received a commission of $150,000 which he failed to report to or share with Nations. Nations learned of the transaction and terminated Wolf.
This action involves Nation's suit against Wolf to receive its share of the unreported commission and Wolf's counterclaim for commissions for work in progress at the time he was terminated. The jury awarded Nations the entire commission on the sale of Wolf's brother's property. Wolf's counterclaim involving two transactions which ultimately closed beyond fourteen days of Wolf's termination was denied by directed verdict.
We affirm the directed verdict on the counterclaim. We reverse that part of the judgment, however, which permits Nations to keep the entire commission paid on the sale of the brother's business. This commission was earned during Wolf's employment and he was entitled to his percentage of it. His termination, even if for cause, does not justify a forfeiture of Wolf's share of the commission.
We remand to the trial court with instructions to compute Wolf's share of the commission pursuant to the formula contained in the agreement and reduce that amount from the judgment herein.
AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part and REMANDED.
HARRIS, Judge.
W. SHARP and ANTOON, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 98-6.
Decided: October 23, 1998
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida,Fifth District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)