Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
DAVE ROMERO, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
Upon concession of error, we reverse and remand for the lower court to enter a corrected sentence as to count 3 to reflect the sentence is to run concurrently with Appellant's federal probation, consistent with the court's oral pronouncement.1 See Williams v. State, 957 So. 2d 600, 603 (Fla. 2007) (“[W]e have determined that a written sentence that conflicts with the oral pronouncement of [a] sentence imposed in open court is an illegal sentence. Indeed, we have restricted the authority of a trial court to enter a conflicting written sentence in this manner.”).
REVERSED and REMANDED.
FOOTNOTES
1. This case was transferred from the Fifth District Court of Appeal to this Court on January 1, 2023.
SASSO, C.J.
WOZNIAK and WHITE, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: Case No. 6D23-1277
Decided: May 12, 2023
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Sixth District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)