Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Dr. Gary Boraks, LLC a/a/o Runnell D. Curry, Appellant, v. Florida Insurance Guaranty Association, Appellee.
AFFIRMED. See § 631.70, Fla. Stat. (2020) (“The provisions of s[ection] 627.428 providing for an attorney's fee shall not be applicable to any claim presented to the [Florida Insurance Guaranty Association] under the provisions of this part, except when [FIGA] denies by affirmative action, other than delay, a covered claim or a portion thereof.” (emphasis added)); Jones v. Fla. Ins. Guar. Ass'n, Inc., 908 So. 2d 435, 438, 453 (Fla. 2005) (“With regard to permissible damages in a duty to defend action, we hold that FIGA's liability shall not exceed the policy limits of the insolvent insurer (up to the statutory maximum), plus interest from the date of judgment against the insured (if the payment of such interest is provided for under the policy's supplementary payment provision), as well as statutory interest from the date of judgment against FIGA and any attorneys’ fees resulting from FIGA's denial of coverage․ Attorney's fees may ․ be awarded pursuant to section 631.70 of the Florida Statutes when FIGA denies a covered claim by affirmative action other than delay․ [T]he proper award of damages in the instant matter could have only been a base award of [the policy limit of the insolvent insurer (up to the statutory maximum)], commensurate with [the insolvent insurer's] limit of liability in the underlying policy, plus interest on that amount as provided under the policy's supplementary payment provision, and statutory interest from the date of the judgment against FIGA until payment along with attorney fees due to FIGA's denial of coverage.” (citations omitted) (emphasis added)); see generally Fla. Ins. Guar. Ass'n, Inc. v. Waterfire Restoration, LLC, 427 So. 3d 996, 998 (Fla. 4th DCA 2025) (“FIGA is not obligated to pay attorneys’ fees to the same extent as an insurer ․” (citing § 631.70, Fla. Stat.)); SFR Servs., LLC v. Fla. Dep't of Fin. Servs. o/b/o Avatar Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co., 412 So. 3d 179, 180 n.4 (Fla. 6th DCA 2025) (“[T]he attorney's fees provisions of section 627.428 are not ‘applicable to any claim presented to [FIGA],’ with a limited exception.” (second alteration in original) (quoting § 631.70, Fla. Stat.)); § 631.51(1), Fla. Stat. (stating that one of the statutory “purposes” of the FIGA statute is to “[p]rovide a mechanism for the payment of covered claims under certain insurance policies to avoid excessive delay in payment and to avoid financial loss to claimants or policyholders because of the insolvency of an insurer”).1
FOOTNOTES
1. Sections 627.428 and 631.70, Florida Statutes, were repealed effective March 24, 2023. See ch. 2023-15, §§ 11, 24, 31, Laws of Fla.
PER CURIAM.
SMITH, BROWNLEE and PRATT, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: Case No. 6D2024-2504
Decided: April 17, 2026
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Sixth District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)