Steven Kenneth Kaiser, Appellant, v. State of Florida, Appellee. (2026)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Sixth District.

Steven Kenneth Kaiser, Appellant, v. State of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 6D2024-0559

Decided: April 02, 2026

Blair Allen, Public Defender, and Pamela H. Izakowitz, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Helene S. Parnes, Manager II Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

AFFIRMED. See Knox v. State, 296 So. 3d 989, 993 (Fla. 1st DCA 2020) (“A trial court's ruling on a motion to suppress is presumed correct, and we must interpret the evidence and reasonable inferences derived therefrom in a manner most favorable to sustaining the trial court's ruling. It is for the trial court to make credibility determinations and to weigh the evidence.” (citing State v. Dickey, 203 So. 3d 958, 961 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016))); Avalos v. State, 419 So. 3d 299, 300 (Fla. 6th DCA 2025) (“From our review, the record demonstrates beyond a reasonable doubt that a rational jury would have found the requisite facts for imposing a habitual felony offender designation and that, therefore, any error is harmless.”).

PER CURIAM.

TRAVER, C.J., and MIZE and PRATT, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network