Steven Kenneth Kaiser, Appellant, v. State of Florida, Appellee. (2026)

AFFIRMED. See Knox v. State, 296 So. 3d 989, 993 (Fla. 1st DCA 2020) (“A trial court's ruling on a motion to suppress is presumed correct, and we must interpret the evidence and reasonable inferences derived therefrom in a manner most favorable to sustaining the trial court's ruling. It is for the trial court to make credibility determinations and to weigh the evidence.” (citing State v. Dickey, 203 So. 3d 958, 961 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016))); Avalos v. State, 419 So. 3d 299, 300 (Fla. 6th DCA 2025) (“From our review, the record demonstrates beyond a reasonable doubt that a rational jury would have found the requisite facts for imposing a habitual felony offender designation and that, therefore, any error is harmless.”).

PER CURIAM.

TRAVER, C.J., and MIZE and PRATT, JJ., concur.