Terence J. Madigan v. East Hartford Housing Authority (2013)

Superior Court of Connecticut.

Terence J. Madigan v. East Hartford Housing Authority

CV095031914S

Decided: June 04, 2013

ORDER RE NOTICE THAT DECISION HAS NOT BEEN FILED PURSUANT TO § 64–1(a )

The foregoing, having been considered by the Court, is hereby ORDERED as follows:

The trial court is not required to issue a written memorandum of decision encompassing its conclusions as to each claim of law raised by the parties and the factual basis therefor, pursuant to Practice Book § 6–1 or § 64–1, because the court denied the motion to set aside the verdict and the denial does not constitute a judgment, rather judgment entered on the verdict when the motion to set aside the verdict was denied. See Gordon v. Feldman, 164 Conn. 554, 557, 325 A.2d 247 (1973).

A. Susan Peck, Judge

Peck, A. Susan, J.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network