Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
State of Connecticut v. Tyshawn Case # 237702
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
The petitioner in this case is Tyshawn Case. He was convicted after a jury trial of the crime of carrying a pistol without a permit 1 and received a sentence of 5 years of incarceration.
The facts of the case are as follows. The East Hartford Police, on July 1, 2009, investigated the shooting death of a person who was attending an outdoor vigil that was held in honor of a second person. That second person had himself been shot to death on the previous evening in East Hartford.
The police learned that Anthony Williams and the petitioner had been involved in an argument with the victim on July 1, close to the time the victim had been killed. They also found out that Williams and the petitioner had left the scene in an automobile after the altercation and then returned later with a handgun. Subsequent to the return of Williams and the petitioner the victim was killed.
The petitioner was ultimately arrested and charged with murder, carrying a pistol without a permit and a variety of other charges. The jury acquitted the petitioner of all the charges except carrying a pistol without a permit.
The petitioner claims that his sentence is both “inappropriate” and “disproportionate” pursuant to Practice Book Section 43–28 because he did not go to the vigil with the intent to harm the victim. In addition, he claims that he himself was assaulted at the time of the incident and that somehow during the chaos surrounding the incident, he unknowingly came into possession of the pistol.
The state urges the Division to keep the sentence intact. It argues that the petitioner has seven felony convictions that involve gun possession, that he has violated multiple probations and that he is a danger to the community.
The Division, after carefully considering all the relevant materials submitted and the arguments of counsel, finds that the sentence imposed by the trial court is well within the parameters of Section 43–28. The petitioner has been convicted of numerous violent crimes, including assault and robbery. In addition, he has failed multiple probations and has not accepted responsibility for his felonious conduct in this matter. There is no persuasive reason to reduce the sentence imposed by the trial court.
The sentence is AFFIRMED.
Gary J. White, J.
Joan K. Alexander
Brian T. Fischer
White, J., Alexander, J. and Fischer, J. participated in this decision.
FOOTNOTES
FN1. See General Statutes Section 29–35. This crime carries a mandatory minimum one year jail sentence and a maximum sentence of five years of incarceration.. FN1. See General Statutes Section 29–35. This crime carries a mandatory minimum one year jail sentence and a maximum sentence of five years of incarceration.
White, Gary J., Alexander, Joan K., Fischer, Brian T., Js.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: HHDCR09224151
Decided: October 25, 2011
Court: Superior Court of Connecticut.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)