Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Cara Mocarski v. Ronald Mocarski
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO MODIFY ALIMONY
Pursuant to its Dissolution Decree entered in January 2008, the defendant is obligated to pay the plaintiff life time alimony of $2,725.00 per month based upon an annual salary of $104,000. The defendant now seeks to modify the alimony of $2,725. per month although his salary of $104,000 remains the same.
Section 46b–86(a) C.G.S. provides in substance that the court may modify alimony upon a showing of a substantial change in circumstance subsequent to the earlier order.
The traditional purpose of alimony is to meet one's continuing obligation to support a former wife. To avoid re-visiting matters in a modification proceedings the payor is only allowed to present evidence concerning circumstance occurring subsequent to prior order. Thus, alimony decree may only be modified upon proof of a substantial change in circumstances since the original decree was granted.
The initial decree is not to be disturbed unless the moving party has met the burden of proving a change in circumstances. The moving party is expected to prove there has been a substantial change in circumstances demonstrating that continued operation of the original order would be unfair and improper. Section 35.28, Connecticut Family Law Practice.
The Court finds that the defendant's salary of $104,000 has not changed.
The court further finds as reflected in the defendant's financial affidavit that the cash value of his assets is $609,748.
Based upon the evidence and applicable rules of law, the court finds that the defendant has not sustained his burden of proof warranting a modification of alimony since the original decree. The Motion to Modify Alimony is denied.
Judge John C. Flanagan
Flanagan, John C., J.T.R.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: FA064007305
Decided: April 04, 2011
Court: Superior Court of Connecticut.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)