Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Donald Allegrini v. Town of Hamden et al.
ORDER
ORDER REGARDING:02/22/11 105.00 MOTION TO STRIKE
The foregoing, having been considered by the Court, is hereby:
ORDER: GRANTED
The defendants' motion to strike counts one and two of the plaintiff's complaint is granted. “In general, the exercise of duties involving inspection, maintenance and repair of hazards are considered discretionary acts entitled to governmental immunity ․ (defendants' acts discretionary in nature because what constitutes reasonable, proper or adequate inspection involves exercise of judgment) ․ (city's allegedly negligent design and maintenance of stairwell was discretionary because determinations of what is reasonable and proper under particular set of circumstances necessarily involve exercise of judgment) ․ A municipality necessarily makes discretionary policy decisions with respect to the timing, frequency, method and extent of inspections, maintenance and repairs. Grignano v. City of Milford, 106 Conn.App. 648, 656 (2008) (citations omitted). Plaintiff's complaint merely alleges that defendant failed generic common-law duties to inspect and remedy the aisles of the public library for obstacles such as the back pack over which the plaintiff allegedly tripped. By contrast, in his brief in opposition to the defendant's motion to strike the plaintiff asserts that “[W]e don't know ․ if defendants had promulgated any rules or procedures pertaining to maintenance of the aisles and inspection of the aisles that would make such activity ministerial as opposed to discretionary.” That is exactly the point that the defendants are raising: the plaintiff has not pled the violation or existance of any such “guidelines or procedures,” as the plaintiff did, for example, in the case of Kumah v. Brown, 127 Conn.App. 254, 258 (2011). “The actions of Lucas [as an agent of the town] were ministerial to the extent there exist prescribed standards, regulations, rules and/or procedures requiring that town firefighters and other municipal officials perform their duties in securing a traffic accident scene in a prescribed manner without the exercise of judgment or discretion.” Id. As the complaint is pled, the court must grant the defendants' motion to strike counts one and two. Plaintiff may plead over per Section 10–44 of the Practice Book.
Judge: MATTHEW E. FRECHETTE
Frechette, Matthew E., J.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: NNHCV116016475S
Decided: March 22, 2011
Court: Superior Court of Connecticut.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)