Julie A. Fedorovich v. Edward A. Fedorovich (2010)

ORDER

The Court after further hearing and evidence hereby rules on the proposed orders submitted by the respective parties concerning further clarification of the underlying dissolution of marriage decree entered on September 17, 2008 and the subsequent memorandum issued by the Court on July 1, 2010 concerning certain postjudgment issues.   The Court attempts to specifically answer the concerns raised in the said proposed orders by each party with the understanding that issues not raised in those proposed orders are hereby waived by the parties and will not be addressed by this Court.   This has been an extended and torturous proceeding in which rancor and retribution were palpable between the parties.   Hopefully, this will be the last and final sequel to this matter between the parties and no further Court intervention will be sought.

(1) The first issue raised concerns the property at 20 Sedgewick Lane in Litchfield concerning the real estate taxes.   The Court recognizes that there may be amounts owed between the parties before the dissolution date of September 17, 2008, but this order relates only to accrued amounts owed principally by the defendant to the plaintiff.   The Court looks at the controlling dates being the dissolution date of September 17, 2008 through the date of transfer of the said property at 20 Sedgewick Lane on March 6, 2009.   The Court finds that controlling date or time frame to be five (5) months, seventeen (17) days and that the real estate taxes based on the submittals from the parties is chargeable to the defendant at $437.00.   All amounts in this Order are rounded off to the next dollar amount.   Any delinquent balance owed prior to said September 17th, are merged into the decree and are to be assumed by the plaintiff.

(2) The second item is the mortgage on the said property 20 Sedgewick Lane. The Court agrees with the defendant's calculation that the defendant's share should be $3,152.00.

(3) Re:  the water pollution control authority lien and assessment, the Court finds that one-half of that amount for the time in question results in an amount owed by the defendant to be $890.00.

(4) The trucking and clean-up of said property is to be split in half resulting in $202.00 being owed by the defendant.

The subtotal for these four (4) items is $4,681.

(5) All of the other items that have not been addressed are to be assumed as expenses to the plaintiff.   The remaining eleven (11) items have been agreed to by the parties and therefore those balances relating to Evan's care and support are still owed by the defendant to the plaintiff as his one-half shared amount and are itemized as follows:

(A) Child Support from 2/2/09 to 8/1/09 in the amount of $2,782.

(B) Phoenix amount shared-$133.00.

(C) St. Mary's Hospital bill in a shared amount-$1,037.00.

(D) Franklin Medical Group-$137.00.

(E) Rite Aid Pharmacy-$68.00.

(F) Dr. Markowski-$77.00.

(G) Dr. David Van Handle-$1,105.00.

(H) Health Insurance Premium-$844.00.

(I) Health Insurance Premium-$175.00.

(J) Tutoring-$200.00 is considered part of the basic child support obligation owed by defendant.

(K) The largest item chargeable to the defendant is the Red Cliff Assent Program which the Court has found to be shared equally by the parents, the defendant's portion being $15,650.00.   This results in a subtotal of $22,208.

This results in a total balance of $26,889, being owed by the defendant to the plaintiff.

The defendant will begin making monthly payments to the plaintiff by November 15th and every 30 days thereafter in a minimum monthly amount of $600 until total balance is satisfied, if not sooner.

All other outstanding issues are hereby waived by the parties or have been previously addressed by the Court and are not to be renewed for any reason without good cause shown.

BY ORDER OF THE COURT,

Roche, J.

Roche, Vincent E., J.