Leona Leven v. Vitas Healthcare Services Corp (2010)

ORDER

The motion for summary judgment is granted.

No objection has been filed and plaintiff's counsel did not appear for argument.   For the well stated reasons in memorandum accompanying the motion the court agrees that as to the counts specified they are barred by the statute of limitations and as to the Seventh Count, even if there was a violation of public policy a statutory remedy existed to vindicate it, which was not pursued thus barring a common-law claim for wrongful termination;  see Good v. Goodway Technologies Corp., 1996 Conn.Super Lexis, 2559 (Hartmere, J., 1996).   See also Pickering v. Aspen Dental Management, 100 Conn.App. 793, 799 (2007), Burnham v. Karl & Gelb, 252 Conn. pp. 161-62 (2000).

Corradino, J.

Corradino, Thomas J., J.T.R.