Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Kimela Kelner v. John Kelner
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
On July 16, 2009 and November 10, 2009, the court addressed the issues of child support and Educational Support Orders. Upon further review the court did not set the child support amount for the two youngest children, Emili and Jay. The present order for three children is $467 per week based upon the net weekly income of the defendant of approximately $2,000 and that of the plaintiff being zero. According to the child support guidelines then in effect the presumptive child support amounted to $467 per week for the support of the three children, including John for whom child support has since terminated in accordance with the applicable Connecticut statute. Since the original order the defendant's net weekly income is $1,316. The court has also reviewed the transcript of the hearing of May 23, 2008, et seq., and finds that the plaintiff has an earning capacity of $35,000 per year. Allowing for the permitted deductions for taxes, etc, the plaintiff's net weekly income is $567. For 2 children the presumptive child support based upon a combined net weekly income of $1,880 is $409. The defendant's share amounts to $286. When Emili reaches the date for the termination of child support the amount for Jay would be $307 assuming no change in the child support guidelines, and no substantial change in the income of either party. The amount of $286 is so ordered with the parties to reconcile any under/over payments within 30 days since child support for John terminated on May 17, 2008. When Emili reaches the date for the termination of her child support, the remaining child Jay would be entitled to support of $214.
The judgment further provided for additional child support from any bonuses the defendant receives while any children or child is entitled to support. Since only two children remain, the percentage of bonus to which the plaintiff is entitled for support is 20%, and when only one child remains, 15%. If any payments were made at the 25% level after John's support terminated on May 17, 2008, the plaintiff shall remit the difference to the defendant within 90 days of this decision.
SO ORDERED.
BY THE COURT,
CARUSO, JTR
Caruso, John R., J.T.R.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: FA054012548
Decided: December 10, 2009
Court: Superior Court of Connecticut.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)