Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
SAMMY EARL COLLINS, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.
ORDER AFFIRMING IN PART, REVERSING IN PART AND REMANDING
Sammy Earl Collins appeals from an order of the district court denying a postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed on December 15, 2021. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Christy L. Craig, Judge.
Collins first claimed the Nevada Department of Corrections (NDOC) erroneously structured his sentences in contradiction of NRS 176.035 and NRS 213.1213. The district court denied the petition as moot after finding that Collins previously sought corrections to his time credit calculations and sentence structures and that NDOC properly applied all credits to which Collins was entitled. However, Collins instant petition did not challenge his time credit calculations, and the district court did not address Collins’ claims regarding sentencing structure. Accordingly, we conclude the district court erred by denying Collins’ petition as moot.
Moreover, the record lacks the necessary details about how and why NDOC structured Collins’ sentences as it did. Thus, Collins’ challenge to his sentence structure is not belied by the record and, if true, would entitle him to some relief. Therefore, we conclude the district court erred by denying Collins’ sentence structure claim without conducting an evidentiary hearing. See Hargrove v. State, 100 Nev. 498, 502-03, 686 P.2d 222, 225 (1984). Accordingly, we reverse the district court's denial of this claim and remand for the district court to conduct an evidentiary hearing.
Collins also claimed that he was denied his right to counsel because an NDOC employee resentenced him without counsel present. NDOC's administration of an offender's sentence does not alter the sentence imposed in the judgment of conviction and thus does not constitute Therefore, we conclude that Collins’ claim that he was resentenced by NDOC is belied by the record and he is not entitled to relief based on this claim. Accordingly, we
ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED IN PART AND REVERSED IN PART AND REMAND this matter to the district court for proceedings consistent with this order.
Gibbons, C.J.
Bulla, J.
Westbrook, J.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 84694-COA
Decided: February 14, 2023
Court: Court of Appeals of Nevada.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)