DIXON v. STATE (2026)

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Because no statute or rule permits an appeal from an order denying an “amended application/petition for reconsideration of credits for time served,” we lack jurisdiction to consider this appeal.¹ Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, we

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

FOOTNOTES

1.   A claim for additional presentence credit is a challenge to the validity of the judgment of conviction and sentence and therefore must be raised on direct appeal or in a postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus. See Griffin v. State, 122 Nev. 737, 744, 137 P.3d 1165, 1169 (2006). We express no opinion as to whether Dixon could meet the procedural requirements of NRS Chapter 34.