Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Petitioner v. SUPERIOR COURT of the County of Los Angeles, Respondent; HUTCHERSON et al., Real Parties in Interest.
The above-entitled cause is retransferred to the Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division Three for consideration of whether and to what extent the principles enunciated in Tech-Bilt, Inc. v. Woodward-Clyde & Associates (1985) 38 Cal.3d 488, 213 Cal.Rptr. 256, 698 P.2d 159, may be applicable to an agreement of this type.
The application of C.J. Anderson and Company to file as amicus curiae in the case is denied without prejudice to renewal of the application before the Court of Appeal.
KAUS, BROUSSARD, REYNOSO and GRODIN, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: July 18, 1985
Court: Supreme Court of California.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)