Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Ex parte DEANE.
This is a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Petitioner is engaged in the business of purchasing automobiles at points outside the state, and driving or towing them into the state for resale. In 1935 the Legislature passed the ‘Caravan Act’ (Stats.1935, c. 402, p. 1453), regulating the practice of ‘caravaning,’ defined as the transportation ‘from without the State of any motor vehicle operated on its own wheels, or in tow of another motor vehicle, for the purpose of selling or offering the same for sale.’ Section 1. The statute (sections 2, 3) required a special permit for each vehicle, and imposed a fee of $15 for such permit. Petitioner was arrested and charged with violating this statute.
While the petition was pending, a proceeding was brought by Howard Morf in the federal District Court for Southern California (14 F.Supp. 922) to restrain the state director for motor vehicles and other officers from enforcing the provisions of the statute. The court held the statute unconstitutional, and this holding was recently affirmed by the United States Supreme Court. Ingels v. Morf, 57 S.Ct. 439, 81 L.Ed. 653. The sole ground of the decision is that the fee charged for the permit is in excess of the amount reasonably necessary for providing facilities for regulation, and consequently is an unwarranted burden on interstate commerce. Since this is a federal question, the decision of the United States Supreme Court is binding on this court.
The writ is granted, and it is ordered that petitioner be discharged and his bail exonerated.
LANGDON, Justice.
We concur: THOMPSON, J.; SHENK, J.; CURTIS, J.; EDMONDS, J.; SEAWELL, J.
Response sent, thank you
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: Cr. 3958.
Decided: April 16, 1937
Court: Supreme Court of California.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
FindLaw for Legal Professionals
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)