HARRIS v. HARRIS (1936)

Supreme Court of California.

HARRIS v. HARRIS.

Civ. No. 10109(2–1).

Decided: February 17, 1936

Goodspeed, Pendell & McGuire and G. Roy Pendell, all of Los Angeles, for appellant. Frank S. Hutton, of Los Angeles, for respondent.

The petition for hearing for decision by District, Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 1, is denied.

Petitioner contends that the last sentence of the opinion is ambiguous. We do not so construe it. Reading this sentence in connection with the remaining portions of the opinion, we think the intent of the writer of the opinion was to hold that plaintiff is not entitled to any further payments of alimony maturing after October 18, 1930, but without prejudice to her rights to proceed in the divorce action to recover any unpaid installments of alimony accruing prior to that date.

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law