Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of California, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Harold Almus LANGDON, Defendant and Appellant.
Appellant is attempting to appeal from an order of the superior court denying his motion to vacate the judgment. The record shows that the appeal from the judgment was affirmed by the Supreme Court of California. People v. Langdon (52 Cal.2d 425, 341 P.2d 303.)
The superior court was without jurisdiction. (Pen.Code, s 1265.) The order of the superior court is not appealable, and the record on appeal should not have been prepared.
The appeal is dismissed.
PER CURIAM.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: Cr. 13473.
Decided: May 01, 1967
Court: Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 2, California.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)