Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
PEOPLE of the State of California, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Leonard Cordell NICKS, also known as Leonard Mako Nick, Defendant and Appellant.
Defendant Leonard Cordell Nicks was charged by separate informations with possession of marijuana on March 9, 1958 and April 10, 1958. The actions were consolidated for trial; defendant was found not guilty of the March 9th offense, convicted of the later offense and was sentenced to state prison. He appeals from the judgment in propria persona.
There was evidence of the following facts: On March 9th with the consent of the landlady of a rooming house, and in the absence of defendant, police officers entered a room rented and occupied by defendant and found a bag containing marijuana and also articles belonging to the defendant. On April 10th, at another location the officers knocked on the door of a room and were admitted by defendant. With the consent of the defendant the officers searched the premises; they found 34 marijuana cigarettes and defendant took 50 more cigarettes from under a mattress and handed them to the officer. He stated that he sold about a kilo a week but that at the present time he was selling only about one-half a pound a day. Defendant took the stand and testified that he had given the officers permission to search the room because he tried to bluff them; that they certainly searched the room and certainly found the marijuana cigarettes, but that they belonged to another man. No other defense was offered.
The notice of appeal states that it is from the judgment and the sentence, which we construe to be only an appeal from the judgment.
The judgment is affirmed.
PER CURIAM.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: Cr. 6965.
Decided: January 20, 1960
Court: District Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 3, California.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)