Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of California, acting by and through the Department of Public Works, Plaintiff, v. Ernest E. ASHBY et al., Defendants.
Guy N. STAFFORD, Intervener, Cross-Complaint and Appellant, v. G. M. RUSSELL et al., Defendants, Cross-Defendants and Respondents.
The appeal of Guy N. Stafford herein is from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County made December 20, 1957, denying the motion of appellant to annul in part a judgment in Stafford v. Russell, Los Angeles Superior Court No. 568668, by which said Stafford was enjoined from claiming or asserting any right or interest as against G. M. Russell and others in and to certain property, claims to which property said Stafford asserted in the action of People etc. v. Ashby, numbered 648612 in the files of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. The appeal must be dismissed for the following reasons:
1. That in asserting said claims in said action of People v. Ashby, Stafford was, and has been adjudicated to be, in contempt of court through the violation of said injunction.
2. A further ground is that it appears as a matter of record that the said judgment sought to be modified by said motion has been adjudicated to be a valid judgment and that the said motion for a modification and the appeal from said order are baseless and without semblance of merit. In re Stafford, Cal.App., 324 P.2d 967; Stafford v. Russell, 117 Cal.App.2d 319, 255 P.2d 872; Stafford v. Russell, 128 Cal.App.2d 794, 276 P.2d 41; Coburg Oil Co. v. Russell, 136 Cal.App.2d 165, 288 P.2d 305; Coburg Oil Co. v. Russell, 129 Cal.App.2d 214, 276 P.2d 637; Stafford v. Russell, 9 Cir., 220 F.2d 853.
The appeal is dismissed.
PER CURIAM.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: Civ. 23163.
Decided: May 29, 1958
Court: District Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 3, California.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)