SEWARD v. WILKERSON (1955)

District Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 1, California.

Thomas F. SEWARD, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. William R. WILKERSON, Defendant and Appellant.

Civ. 21136.

Decided: July 19, 1955

Bautzer, Grant & Silbert, Beverly Hills, for appellant. No appearance for respondent.

Motion by defendant to augment the record.

Defendant contends that when plaintiff invoked the remedy of attachment the action was converted from equity to law, and that as a consequence plaintiff elected to proceed in law. Therefore, defendant moves to add to the record the several papers involved in the issuance of the writ of attachment.

Without passing upon the sufficiency of the contention, this Court is of the opinion that it will do no harm to have the entire record before it when it considers the merits of the case.

The motion is granted.

DRAPEAU, Justice.

WHITE, P. J., and DORAN, J., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network