Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: BLAIR'S ESTATE. PINES et al. v. BLAIR et al.
Among the items in this estate were an apartment house and parking lot in Pasadena, across the street from the Pasadena city hall. The property was appraised in the probate estate for $106,000. It had been appraised for $145,000 in the guardianship estate of decedent.
The county of Los Angeles became interested in the parking lot. Later on the county decided to acquire both parcels. Neither the county nor the estate could agree upon the value. It was therefore necessary for counsel for the estate to prepare for trial a defendant's case in eminent domain. Finally the county offered $157,500, which was accepted by the estate and approved by the probate court.
Counsel petitioned for extraordinary fees, objections were made, the matter was heard by the court, and an order made allowing counsel $10,000. From this order interested parties in the estate appeal. See Estate of Blair, 126 Cal.App.2d 759, 272 P.2d 866.
The probate court had before it evidence that supports the order. One of counsel testified to time spent in protracted negotiations, in familiarizing himself with values, preparing the legal case, and directing preparation for the presentation of the facts to a trial court.
It is only when there is a manifest abuse of discretion that a reviewing court will overrule such orders as this. Estate of Lundell, 95 Cal.App.2d 352, 212 P.2d 914, 214 P.2d 23.
The order is affirmed.
DRAPEAU, Justice.
DORAN, Acting P. J., and MOSK, J. pro tem., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: Civ. 20232.
Decided: August 17, 1954
Court: District Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 1, California.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)