CRAMER v. CERCIAT FRENCH LAUNDRY DRY CLEANERS (1954)

District Court of Appeal, First District, Division 2, California.

CRAMER v. CERCIAT FRENCH LAUNDRY & DRY CLEANERS et al.

Civ. 15639.

Decided: March 10, 1954

Dreyfus, McTernan & Lubliner, Leslie Lubliner, Jarvis, Miller & Decker, Charles W. Decker, San Francisco, for appellant. Boyd, Taylor & Reynolds, San Francisco, for respondents.

Both parties have briefed this appeal on the assumption it was taken from the judgment. However, reference to the transcript discloses that the appeal is limited to the order denying plaintiff's motion for a new trial.

As it is settled beyond question, sec. 963, subd. 2, Code of Civil Procedure, that an appeal does not lie from an order denying a new trial, this appeal must be dismissed, and it is so ordered.

NOURSE, Presiding Justice.

DOOLING and KAUFMAN, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network