TANNENBAUM v. SUPERIOR COURT IN AND FOR CITY COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO (1953)

District Court of Appeal, First District, Division 1, California.

Ex parte TANNENBAUM. Ex parte BROWN. TANNENBAUM v. SUPERIOR COURT IN AND FOR CITY & COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO.
BROWN v. SUPERIOR COURT IN AND FOR CITY & COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO.

Cr. 2900, 2901; 15673 and 15674.

Decided: January 16, 1953

John P. Golden, San Francisco, for petitioner Joseph tannenbaum. Leslie C. Gillen, San Francisco, Sol. A. Abrams, San Francisco, for petitioner Carl E. Brown.

The petitions for writs of habeas corpus are denied.

The court is of the opinion that the rule of People v. Talle, 111 Cal.App.2d 650, 245 P.2d 633, applying Stats. of 1871, p. 319, was not here violated. See generally In re Lemon, 15 Cal.App.2d 82, 59 P.2d 213; United States v. Price, C.C., 163 F. 904. We are further of the view that the testimony of an accomplice is sufficient upon which to indict as it is to hold to answer. People v. McRae, 31 Cal.2d 184, 187 P.2d 741. The other points raised do not necessitate discussion. The petitions for writs of prohibition are denied.

PETERS, Presiding Justice.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network