Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
PEOPLE v. STONES.
After trial by the court, defendant was found guilty of two counts of bookmaking. Pen.Code, sec. 337a. No evidence was presented in his behalf. Application for probation was denied, and he was sentenced to six months in the county jail, sentences on each count to run concurrently.
Defendant was a shoe-shine boy in a barber shop. The arresting officer testified that he saw him talking to people, making notes, and accepting money. The arresting officer asked him how many shoes he had shined that morning, and he said seventeen. But his hands were clean. He had in his possession $197 in small bills.
One of defendant's customers gave him $2 and said ‘Two to place on Number 449.’ Number 449 was the code symbol for a horse named Iron Pen, running that day at the Del Mar race track. Defendant made a notation on a memorandum pad, and put the pad into a pocket in his shoe-shine apron. This pad was taken from defendant, and was a combination betting marker and owe sheet used in bookmaking.
Defendant urges that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the conviction.
From the facts stated, the evidence is sufficient. People v. Newland, 15 Cal.2d 678, 104 P.2d 778; People v. Mason, 37 Cal.App.2d 407, 99 P.2d 567; People v. Pruitt, 55 Cal.App.2d 272, 130 P.2d 767.
People v. Woods, 35 Cal.2d 504, 218 P.2d 981, is not the same as the case against defendant.
Defendant also urges that he was convicted twice for the same offense. This point was not raised in the trial court. In any event, the evidence showed a violation of Subdivisions 2 and 4 of Penal Code, Section 337a. People v. Jerman, 29 Cal.2d 189, 173 P.2d 805.
The judgment is affirmed.
DRAPEAU, Justice.
WHITE, P. J., and DORAN, J., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: Cr. 4456.
Decided: August 18, 1950
Court: District Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 1, California.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)