CAMERON v. CAMERON (1949)

District Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 2, California.

CAMERON v. CAMERON.

Civ. 16756.

Decided: February 01, 1949

Combs, McIntyre & Scales, of Los Angeles, for appellant. Meserve, Mumper & Hughes and Loeb & Loeb, all of Los Angeles, for respondent.

Plaintiff recovered a money judgment in the superior court against defendant. Pursuant to section 2422 of the Civil Code, a charging order was issued charging defendant's interest in a partnership with payment of the judgment.

Plaintiff made a motion for an order for the foreclosure and sale of defendant's interest in the partnership under the charging order. The motion was denied and plaintiff has appealed from the order. After the appeal was taken the judgment on which the charging order was based was reversed by this court. Cameron v. Cameron, 88 Cal.App.2d 585, 199 P.2d 443. Since the reversal of the judgment removes the basis for the charging order the appeal from the order denying foreclosure thereof is now moot.

Appeal dismissed.

WILSON, Justice.

MOORE, P. J., and McCOMB, J., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network