HEMET VALLEY GROWERS v. PARSSINEN (1949)

District Court of Appeal, Fourth District, California.

HEMET VALLEY GROWERS, Inc. v. PARSSINEN et al.

Civ. 3858.

Decided: February 07, 1949

Robert M. Wiley, of Hemet, for appellants. Gerald A. Coxe, of Hemet, for respondent.

On petition for rehearing it is contended that the pleadings, properly construed, disclose no admission through a failure to deny. The answer admitted that the services alleged in the complaint were furnished, but alleged that another was responsible for a portion of them. The case was tried on this theory. If those portions of the opinion which refer to an admission in the pleadings were to be eliminated it would in no way affect the result.

The petition for a rehearing is denied.

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network