Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
PEOPLE v. ONE 1939 OLDSMOBILE SEDAN, ENGINE NO. F921523 et al.
SAME v. ONE 1941 CHEVROLET SPORT SEDAN, ENGINE NO. AA–74879 et al.
Appeals from judgments forfeiting to the State two taxicabs in proceedings brought under section 52 of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act. Stats.1935, p. 1123 and amendments thereto, Deering's Gen.Laws 1941 Supp., p. 2006, Act 3796. The two causes were consolidated for trial and on appeal.
The two claimants and appellants operated a taxicab business in the City of Tulare, with a fleet of taxicabs operated by drivers employed for that purpose. On April 10, 1943, the drivers, respectively, of the two taxicabs here in question were approached by an operative for the State Board of Equalization who requested and was given transportation at the regular rates. In each instance, the operative purchased liquor from the driver during the trip. It appears, without dispute, and the court found, that the claimants—appellants are the owners of these taxicabs; that they were then engaged in carrying persons for hire as common carriers; and that the unlawful acts of the drivers of these taxicabs in transporting and selling whiskey were without the knowledge and consent of the claimants-appellants. On the theory that because these sales were unlawful there was at the time a departure from the lawful business of carrying passengers, the court also found that at the time in question these automobiles were not being used as common carriers. Judgment of forfeiture were entered and these appeals followed.
The material facts and contentions here involved are exactly similar and substantially the same as those involved and considered in People v. One 1937 Lincoln, etc., Sedan, Cal.Sup., 160 P.2d 769. On the authority of that case, each of the judgments here appealed from is reversed with directions to the trial court to enter judgment releasing the vehicle in question to the owner.
PER CURIAM.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: Civ. 3150.
Decided: January 11, 1946
Court: District Court of Appeal, Fourth District, California.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)